On Fri Jul 01 11:24:42 2011, jesse wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote: > > You know, I have all *kinds* of constructs that work like ql(...), > > qwx(...), etc, which I use *all* the time. But I see no need to go > > rewriting the language to turn them into keywords proper, with all the > > attendant complexity and confusion. > > > > Since it can be done with existing technology, why *shouldn't* it be? > > Indeed it should be. I think we've beaten this particular horse to > death. But I can still apply the first two patches, right?Thread Previous | Thread Next