On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote: > You know, I have all *kinds* of constructs that work like ql(...), > qwx(...), etc, which I use *all* the time. But I see no need to go > rewriting the language to turn them into keywords proper, with all the > attendant complexity and confusion. > > Since it can be done with existing technology, why *shouldn't* it be? Indeed it should be. I think we've beaten this particular horse to death. > > --tom --Thread Previous | Thread Next