* Jesse Vincent <jesse@fsck.com> [2011-06-30T13:25:18] > > On Mon 27.Jun'11 at 12:38:28 -0700, Eric Brine wrote: > > > Patch 3: > > > > Add feature qw_comments, which allows comments to be used in the qw() > > operator. > > I'm not in favor of this one. It breaks my assumptions about > what qw means. (Those being "This text will be split on whitespace > boundaries but otherwise won't be touched") I am not in favor of this change, but I will play devil's advocate very very briefly: Aren't comments sometimes just line-ending whitespace? My initial reply was going to be: I don't like making qw special, why not comments in multiline qq strings? But then the problem is that you don't know what to do here: my $x = qq{ Foo # bar Baz }; Are the two whitespace lines before # in the string itself? This isn't a problem in qw, where the whitespace is already gone. Then again, it isn't in qx, either... Yup. Still not in favor of this change, either. -- rjbsThread Previous | Thread Next