Re: Any objection to allowing no-op underscores between regex modifiers?

On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Karl Williamson
<public@khwilliamson.com> wrote:
> Allowing underscores as a way for the user to separate the regex modifiers

Unless you want to separate the /gceer options, you can always
separate your options like /(?x)(?some options)(?more options).../.

Ambrus

• Any objection to allowing no-op underscores between regex modifiers? by Karl Williamson
• Re: Any objection to allowing no-op underscores between regex modifiers? by Zsbán Ambrus
• Re: Any objection to allowing no-op underscores between regex modifiers? by brian d foy
• Re: Any objection to allowing no-op underscores between regexmodifiers? by Jesse Vincent
• Re: Any objection to allowing no-op underscores between regexmodifiers? by Nicholas Clark
• Re: Any objection to allowing no-op underscores between regex modifiers? by Johan Vromans
• Re: Any objection to allowing no-op underscores between regex modifiers? by Tom Christiansen