develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from May 2011

RE: [PATCH] export store_cop_label

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
vadim.konovalov
Date:
May 27, 2011 07:33
Subject:
RE: [PATCH] export store_cop_label
Message ID:
35BF8D9716175C43BB9D67CA60CC345E2B69BE90@FRMRSSXCHMBSC2.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com
> From: Joshua ben Jore
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:26 AM, Jan Dubois wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 May 2011, Joshua ben Jore wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Jan Dubois wrote:
> >>> B::C is not in ext/ inside the core, so "EX" does not 
> apply. If you
> >>> want to use it from CPAN, is has to be "A". From the core point of
> >>> view, nothing on CPAN is "more special" than everything else.
> >>>
> >>> Claiming upfront that you intend to ignore the spirit of the rules
> >>> anyways just makes it so much harder to get your patch 
> accepted, so
> >>> please don't do that!
> >>
> >> There's utility in exposing things but not making promises about
> >> stable APIs. If that's the point to this change, then I 
> find sympathy
> >> with it.
> >
> > I'm not sure what you are arguing for here:
> >
> > b) ALL internal non-static functions should be exported in case some
> >   module finds utility in them.  But unless the function is marked
> >   as part of the public API we reserve the right to change at will.


Fine.

I think all difficulties are settled now,
and the patch could be applied now?

I do not understand this long long waiting for a patch to be accepted.

It fixes a breakage.

It should be accepted.

Speculating and finding reasons of not to accept it seems counterproductive
to me


> 
> I tend to think Reini ought to be able to get his internal non-static
> function exported because he has actual utility in it. It isn't part
> of the public supported API so it doesn't have any promises about
> being stable between patch releases. We absolutely shouldn't
> prematurely document and fix it's behavior into stability but there's
> little point to preventing something useful from getting access to it.

I agree,
the only think I want to correct a little - it is not Reini who decided to use
said function - it was rather consequences of development of perl parser,
which happen to use it starting from some moment, and this should
be fixed for B::C module.

Vadim.
Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About