On 4/13/2011 5:51 PM, Tom Christiansen wrote: >>> >>> That (still) makes no sense to me. Here's the wording I came up with that >>> reflects what I *thought* it was trying to say: >>> >>> In C<quotemeta> or its inline equivalent C<\Q>, no characters >>> code points above 127 are quoted in UTF-8 encoded strings, but in >>> byte encoded strings, code points between 128-255 are always quoted. > >> That is a 5.14 regression, and I had it wrong. Either the original >> email or ticket was wrong about this, or I misread it, and didn't do the >> legwork of checking it out. Now that I have, I see that your rewording >> is correct. > > Thanks. > > There's a word dropped there somewhere, either a "with" or a "whose" > between "characters" and "code points". > > --tom > "characters" should just be dropped, or a with or whose added.Thread Previous | Thread Next