>> >> That (still) makes no sense to me. Here's the wording I came up with that >> reflects what I *thought* it was trying to say: >> >> In C<quotemeta> or its inline equivalent C<\Q>, no characters >> code points above 127 are quoted in UTF-8 encoded strings, but in >> byte encoded strings, code points between 128-255 are always quoted. > That is a 5.14 regression, and I had it wrong. Either the original > email or ticket was wrong about this, or I misread it, and didn't do the > legwork of checking it out. Now that I have, I see that your rewording > is correct. Thanks. There's a word dropped there somewhere, either a "with" or a "whose" between "characters" and "code points". --tomThread Previous | Thread Next