develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from March 2011

Re: tagging 5.10.0

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Dave Mitchell
Date:
March 11, 2011 07:14
Subject:
Re: tagging 5.10.0
Message ID:
20110311151422.GD2836@iabyn.com
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 09:18:07AM -0500, Jesse Vincent wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:20:27PM +0000, Dave Mitchell wrote:
> > Due to a slight error during the perforce to git migration,
> > the commit that's tagged 'perl-5.10.0' is not actually 5.10.0; it's
> > 
> > This generally causes confusion, especially when bisecting etc.
> > 
> > I propose that the commit marked "untagged" in the diagram above be
> > tagged as 'v5.10.0'.

Now done

> > Perhaps in addition we should add v-style tags for the remaining perl-style
> > tags too (after verifying them)?
> 
> My understanding was that BooK had actually come up with that list
> already. I'd love to see annotated v tags for every actual verified
> release.

I'll leave that for someone else to worry about

-- 
"But Sidley Park is already a picture, and a most amiable picture too.
The slopes are green and gentle. The trees are companionably grouped at
intervals that show them to advantage. The rill is a serpentine ribbon
unwound from the lake peaceably contained by meadows on which the right
amount of sheep are tastefully arranged." -- Lady Croom, "Arcadia"

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About