develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from March 2011

Re: Revising Perl's OO docs - a new OO tutorial

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Brad Gilbert
Date:
March 10, 2011 08:42
Subject:
Re: Revising Perl's OO docs - a new OO tutorial
Message ID:
AANLkTinaMqpKQpZXzWd2A-Z42k5W=zV0oHuR39hOxRUx@mail.gmail.com
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 3:17 AM, Steffen Schwigon <ss5@renormalist.net> wrote:
> Johan Vromans <jvromans@squirrel.nl> writes:
>> Using Moose is not trivial.
>
> Every time I discuss different available Perl OO approaches with
> newbies where really only the basic stuff counts that they know from
> another languages, Moose wins regarding easiness and readability. And
> I for myself know that it will scale to complexity once they come
> back. Of course that's just my experience, it's not an argument.
>
>
>> Installing Moose is even less trivial. It has a dependency chain of
>> 40 modules, several non-PP.
>
> To be fair, Moose has an impressive GREEN testers matrix:
>
>  http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=Moose+1.24
>

It seems that most of those fails are because of an improperly set-up
testing system.

I've had similar fail reports from those same testers.

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About