Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two

On Wednesday 02 February 2011 at 17:12, Matt Sergeant wrote:

> Is there any reason method signatures (or attributes) wouldn't work on 
> top of this implementation?

Attributes work, but the tokenizer deliberately rejects prototype syntax after 
a method keyword (given the uselessness of prototypes for methods). This 
implementation is certainly compatible with a general signature system added 
for both methods and subs.

-- c

• Proposal: "$->" for implicit invocant by Chia-liang Kao
• Re: Proposal: "$->" for implicit invocant by David Golden
• [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" for implicit invocant) by chromatic
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" forimplicit invocant) by Zefram
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" forimplicit invocant) by Chris Prather
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" for implicit invocant) by chromatic
• [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by chromatic
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by Zefram
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by Sam Vilain
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by Zefram
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by Sam Vilain
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by Reverend Chip
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by David E. Wheeler
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by Zefram
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by David Golden
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by David E. Wheeler
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by Matt Sergeant
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by chromatic
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by chromatic
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" forimplicit invocant) by Zefram
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" forimplicit invocant) by Eric Brine
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" forimplicit invocant) by Reini Urban
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" forimplicit invocant) by David Golden
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" forimplicitinvocant) by Steffen Mueller
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" for implicit invocant) by David E. Wheeler
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" forimplicit invocant) by David Golden
• Re: Proposal: "$->" for implicit invocant by Johan Vromans
• Re: Proposal: "$->" for implicit invocant by Zefram
• Re: Proposal: "$->" for implicit invocant by H.Merijn Brand