Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two

David E. Wheeler wrote:
>Do you have a favorite, Zefram?

Not of the currently-available ones, and I don't think we've yet got the
facilities to design one that will stand the test of time.  I want to
see a proper signature system implemented, and then a round of designs
for "method" built around that.  *Then* we'll be in a position to start
talking about blessing one.

-zefram

• Proposal: "$->" for implicit invocant by Chia-liang Kao
• Re: Proposal: "$->" for implicit invocant by David Golden
• [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" for implicit invocant) by chromatic
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" forimplicit invocant) by Zefram
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" forimplicit invocant) by Chris Prather
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" for implicit invocant) by chromatic
• [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by chromatic
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by Zefram
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by Sam Vilain
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by Zefram
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by Sam Vilain
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by Reverend Chip
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by David E. Wheeler
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by Zefram
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by David Golden
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by David E. Wheeler
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by Matt Sergeant
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by chromatic
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by chromatic
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" forimplicit invocant) by Zefram
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" forimplicit invocant) by Eric Brine
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" forimplicit invocant) by Reini Urban
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" forimplicit invocant) by David Golden
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" forimplicitinvocant) by Steffen Mueller
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" for implicit invocant) by David E. Wheeler
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" forimplicit invocant) by David Golden
• Re: Proposal: "$->" for implicit invocant by Johan Vromans
• Re: Proposal: "$->" for implicit invocant by Zefram
• Re: Proposal: "$->" for implicit invocant by H.Merijn Brand