Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two

On Feb 2, 2011, at 2:10 PM, Zefram wrote:

> chromatic wrote:
>> but this swatch of optree building seems to do the trick.
> 
> Reasonably sane implementation.  Though I strongly suspect you could
> replace quite a bit of your added code with more reuse of existing code.
> 
> I remain opposed to actually adding this to core.  I don't see a
> justification for favouring this particular set of semantics for the
> "method" keyword over any of the other proposals; there's certainly
> no consensus yet about which version of it from CPAN is preferred.
> And of course it doesn't need to be in core to work.

Do you have a favorite, Zefram?

Best,

David

• Proposal: "$->" for implicit invocant by Chia-liang Kao
• Re: Proposal: "$->" for implicit invocant by David Golden
• [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" for implicit invocant) by chromatic
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" forimplicit invocant) by Zefram
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" forimplicit invocant) by Chris Prather
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" for implicit invocant) by chromatic
• [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by chromatic
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by Zefram
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by Sam Vilain
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by Zefram
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by Sam Vilain
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by Reverend Chip
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by David E. Wheeler
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by Zefram
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by David Golden
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by David E. Wheeler
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by Matt Sergeant
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by chromatic
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method' take two by chromatic
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" forimplicit invocant) by Zefram
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" forimplicit invocant) by Eric Brine
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" forimplicit invocant) by Reini Urban
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" forimplicit invocant) by David Golden
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" forimplicitinvocant) by Steffen Mueller
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" for implicit invocant) by David E. Wheeler
• Re: [PATCH] use feature 'method'; (was Re: Proposal: "$->" forimplicit invocant) by David Golden
• Re: Proposal: "$->" for implicit invocant by Johan Vromans
• Re: Proposal: "$->" for implicit invocant by Zefram
• Re: Proposal: "$->" for implicit invocant by H.Merijn Brand