develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from February 2011

Re: [ #65284] Module broken with 5.13.x development perlversions

Thread Previous | Thread Next
John Imrie
February 1, 2011 11:31
Re: [ #65284] Module broken with 5.13.x development perlversions
Message ID:
On 01/02/2011 18:45, David Golden wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Jesse Vincent<>  wrote:
>> I'm uncomfortable with us changing base's reported version number this
>> close to 5.14...or possibly ever, depending on how crazy the darkpan
>> really is around this documented bit of base's API.
>> (As I understand it, modern wisdom recommends people move to
>> which doesn't have this problem.)
> I think that leaves two options:
> (a) change version objects to special case "-1, set by" as an
> allowed "lax" version (comparing equal to ????)
> (b) WONTFIX -- and leave people encouraged to switch to
> I understand your feeling regarding changing this close to
> 5.14 and feel even more strongly about changing and core
> internals of version objects this close to 5.14.
> -- David
Would changing the $VERSION set by to a duleval "-1, set by" / 0.00 solve this? or are versions allways taken from the 
string slot these days?


Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About