On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:31:55PM -0800, David Caldwell wrote: > Hello, > > I have a new version of the "safe arrow" patch. I've kept &&-> as > the spelling because, although it's a bit of a mouthful, there > doesn't seem to be an alternative spelling that everyone likes > better. > > This version makes &&-> a single token which makes "&& ->" no > longer valid. The toke.c code is a little hairy but it is not > without precedent. David, I'm sorry for my long silence on this topic. After a fair bit of discussion and consultation, I've settled on ?-> as the spelling I'd like to see for your &&-> defined dereference. If you're up for submitting a revised patch, I'd like to see if we can get it applied and tested more widely before the 5.13 release on the 20th. Best, JesseThread Previous | Thread Next