develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from January 2011

Re: let's be stricted with maint doc changes

Thread Previous | Thread Next
Tony Cook
January 5, 2011 15:10
Re: let's be stricted with maint doc changes
Message ID:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:35:12AM -0500, David Golden wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Nicholas Clark <> wrote:
> > and if any step fails, report back (how?) and flag the commit (how?) as not
> > actually ready.
> maybe cherrymaint needs a "Failed" or "Needs work" status -- meaning
> "approved, but failed to apply".
> I agree with Tux that the last approver shouldn't be expected to do
> the work.  We'll just see things stall at 2 that way.  I think the
> original proposer should be the one to do the work.

There's been times a note would have been useful.

eg. I voted up d9bf0e0 because it fixes a test failure introduced in
30fcd6c (which was already cherry-picked), adding a note for that
would have been useful.


Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About