develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from January 2011

Re: let's be stricted with maint doc changes

Thread Previous | Thread Next
Nicholas Clark
January 5, 2011 08:38
Re: let's be stricted with maint doc changes
Message ID:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:35:12AM -0500, David Golden wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Nicholas Clark <> wrote:
> > and if any step fails, report back (how?) and flag the commit (how?) as not
> > actually ready.
> maybe cherrymaint needs a "Failed" or "Needs work" status -- meaning
> "approved, but failed to apply".
> I agree with Tux that the last approver shouldn't be expected to do
> the work.  We'll just see things stall at 2 that way.  I think the
> original proposer should be the one to do the work.

From the point of view of distributing the workload, that is equally good.
But yes, from the mechanics of avoiding logjams, your suggestion is better.

Nicholas Clark

Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About