develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from January 2011

Re: let's be stricted with maint doc changes

Thread Previous | Thread Next
David Golden
January 5, 2011 08:35
Re: let's be stricted with maint doc changes
Message ID:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Nicholas Clark <> wrote:
> and if any step fails, report back (how?) and flag the commit (how?) as not
> actually ready.

maybe cherrymaint needs a "Failed" or "Needs work" status -- meaning
"approved, but failed to apply".

I agree with Tux that the last approver shouldn't be expected to do
the work.  We'll just see things stall at 2 that way.  I think the
original proposer should be the one to do the work.

-- David

Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About