Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from January 2011
On Tue 4.Jan'11 at 8:54:55 +0000, Nicholas Clark wrote: > > I'm not ok with this idea. maint releases need to be as conservative as > > possible. Part of making sure that happens is by requiring some checks > > and balances before backports happen. Opening up maint for doc > > backports without running through the process runs directly counter to that. > > Agree. However, there are more people qualified to review (and backport) > doc patches. So in theory, if a sufficiency of volunteers volunteer, their > part of the work takes care of itself without slowing others down. But, you've > done it you way - I haven't. Were you finding that all patches were "equal", > in that a doc patch potentially took as much of your time as a C code patch? Is this the part where I ask you if you want to do 5.14.2? ;) It doesn't take as much time as a C patch. But it does take time. > Nicholas ClarkThread Previous | Thread Next