On Sun Jan 02 21:09:45 2011, jesse wrote: > > > > On Sun 26.Dec'10 at 13:31:36 -0800, Father Chrysostomos via RT wrote: > > On Tue Dec 21 12:23:19 2010, zefram@fysh.org wrote: > > > > That sounds like a good idea. I am not comfortable with such a change > > this close to 5.14. (I need to think about the implications on the MRO > > API, if any.) > > > > So perhaps I should just revert those two fixes for now. (After all, an > > old bug is better than a new one.) > > That seems reasonable, yes. :/ Thanks for paying attention to this. > > -j I have just reverted them with 884491db and 7f7845e39.Thread Previous