I'd rather this functionality live on CPAN until there's a clear consensus that it should be in core and about what it should be named. On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 05:35:45PM +0100, Florian Ragwitz wrote: > Zefram <zefram@fysh.org> writes: > > > Given that (a) there are already multiple versions of this on CPAN, > > (b) there are competing versions of the semantics, and (c) it's easy > > to implement a new version on CPAN where the existing versions don't > > provide the desired semantics, it seems to me that the right place for > > this isn't the core, it's CPAN. > > +1 --Thread Previous | Thread Next