On 13 December 2010 10:26, demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12 December 2010 21:26, Father Chrysostomos [snip] >> The really neat thing, which I realised only after writing it, is that it allows for recursive closures to be written much more simply: And this was exactly the reason i recommended a $^SUB "tied" variable for this purpose. Again, great idea. ++ to you. Perhaps if the back compat police dislike __SUB__ you can make it work with $^SUB. cheers, YvesThread Previous | Thread Next