The idea has merit, how about seeing it this way: patch -> AUTHORS ( one's name in lights ) money -> SPONSORS ( company visibility via PR etc. ) all -> DELTA ( specific per release ) ...? -- Richard Foley Ciao - shorter than aufwiedersehen http://www.rfi.net/ On Saturday 20 November 2010 11:58:07 Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:59:21AM +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote: > > Hi, > > > > similar to the AUTHORS file I wonder if it would be right to collect > > the companies and individuals that in some way other than patches > > contributed to the development of perl? > > > > e.g. a SPONSORS file that would contain names of > > companies and individuals that contributed money or developer time > > or other resources. > > Historically we've acknowledged grants and suchlike in the perldelta file > for that release. I'm not sure why, but I feel more comfortable doing it > that way, associating benefactors with the releases they helped happen, and > in the installed documentation. > > Nicholas ClarkThread Previous