On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Eric Brine wrote: > On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, perlbug @ plan9 . de wrote:> so... please > please please make -fstack-protector configurable somehow, > > better yet, don't override user-specified flags and/or improve > the tets > > for platform support. > If Perl only supplements, then -fno-stack-protector should work, right? Does > it? Yes, good call. Configure even actually already contains code to explicitly deal with this situation. (Thanks, Nicholas!) Explicitly adding -fno-stack-protector to ccflags will cause Configure to not add -fstack-protector. This will fix the immediate problem. Still, I agree that a test file that made this happen automatically would be even better. I just don't know what such a test might look like. -- Andy Dougherty doughera@lafayette.eduThread Previous | Thread Next