On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Andy Dougherty <doughera@lafayette.edu>wrote: > On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, perlbug @ plan9 . de wrote:> so... please please > please make -fstack-protector configurable somehow, > > better yet, don't override user-specified flags and/or improve the tets > > for platform support. > > Unfortunately, other users do rely on us supplementing the user-specified > C flags, so I don't think we can win there no matter what we do. There > might be some clever approach, but it's not occurring to me at the moment. > If Perl only supplements, then -fno-stack-protector should work, right? Does it?Thread Previous | Thread Next