Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from November 2010
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:27:51 -0500 (EST), Andy Dougherty <doughera@lafayette.edu> wrote: > > so... please please please make -fstack-protector configurable somehow, > > better yet, don't override user-specified flags and/or improve the tets > > for platform support. > > Unfortunately, other users do rely on us supplementing the user-specified > C flags, so I don't think we can win there no matter what we do. There > might be some clever approach, but it's not occurring to me at the moment. -Ucflags/-ffnork,-DFROUBLE /could/ be a way to go specify what CFLAGS/LDFLAGS/... should be filtered out before the final decision. Just a brainstorm idea > Meanwhile, yes, an improved test program would likely be a very good idea. Absolutely -- H.Merijn Brand http://tux.nl Perl Monger http://amsterdam.pm.org/ using 5.00307 through 5.12 and porting perl5.13.x on HP-UX 10.20, 11.00, 11.11, 11.23 and 11.31, OpenSuSE 10.1, 11.0 .. 11.3 and AIX 5.2 and 5.3. http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/ http://www.test-smoke.org/ http://qa.perl.org http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/Thread Previous