Thanks. Applied (with minor edits) as commit 725a61d709bfdf8b3423a1409027c3ea9cd0c4f9 I'll close the other ticket, too. -- David On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:57 AM, Zefram <zefram@fysh.org> wrote: > In discussing (on #p5p) possible new operators, we ran into the issue > that the obscure ?PATTERN? syntax gets in the way of most uses we could > potentially make of the question mark. It was proposed that we could > deprecate that syntax to reclaim the question mark. Attached patch > does so. It leaves the match-once semantics still available through > m?PATTERN?. > > -zefram >Thread Previous | Thread Next