Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from November 2010
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Tom Christiansen <tchrist@perl.com> wrote: > I don't understand whether one wish to deprecate > C<?pat?> only, or also C<m?pat?>. You only mean > to do the first one, right? Because if you intend > to deprecate *both*, there's a problem. It's been hammered out on IRC. The "vaguely deprecated" applies to ?PATTERN? not m?PATTERN?, which is not how I read it the first time around. Zefram's patch is the correct (more limited) one that only issues warnings for ?PATTERN?. -- DavidThread Previous