Re: [PATCH] refactor GRAMPROG grammar slightly

Father Chrysostomos wrote:
>Is this necessary for an upcoming change? Or does it reduce CPU or
>memory? Or is it just for aesthetics?

Aesthetics.  It's a small improvement in readability and maintainability.

>I?ve seen so many refactorings cause bugs,

eae48c89 did, yes.  This one is very low risk.

-zefram

• [PATCH] refactor GRAMPROG grammar slightly by Zefram
• Re: [PATCH] refactor GRAMPROG grammar slightly by Father Chrysostomos
• Re: [PATCH] refactor GRAMPROG grammar slightly by Zefram
• Re: [PATCH] refactor GRAMPROG grammar slightly by Father Chrysostomos