On Tue Sep 21 10:59:20 2010, jdhedden wrote: > This patch is written to rely on dirent->d_namlen which doesn't always > exist. (I tried it on Cygwin and got build failures). I tried > replacing occurrences of "dirent->d_namlen" with > "strlen(dirent->d_name)+1", and it built and tested successfully. Why +1? d_namlen does not include the null. Does this new patch work for you?Thread Next