On Sun May 02 17:46:08 2010, sprout wrote: > > On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:56 PM, karl williamson wrote: > > > To summarize, I propose that we use Unicode's XID_Start and > > XID_Continue properties in 5.14, even though that breaks one of our > > tests, and possibly existing code. > > Would we change the meanings of is_utf8_idcont and is_utf8_idfirst, or > introduce new functions? > > In anticipation of this change, I’ve attached a patch that corrects > the test in utf8.t to use ¡ instead of ·. I’ve also moved the test > outside of the eval, so it will still run (and fail) if the > compilation fails, instead of causing an invalid test count. I’ve applied this test patch (but not the fix for the original bug reported) as 7b301413cce02b9a948a0e223b4f6a6c0112f1c1.Thread Next