It doesn't seem like we're near a consensus on either the approach to solve the issue, nor what the solution's name should be if we end up putting reftype et al. into a module (although ref:: seems to be favoured by many right now). We really don't want to release with a module in a temporary namespace, and rushing for a solution doesn't seem like a great idea either. We still have plenty of release-cycles left until 5.14 next year. After reverting it in blead, I re-applied it, and pushed the result to a branch called `mauve' for further development of that approach. Feel free to rebase that onto blead, if necessary. If we end up not using the mauve approach, also feel free to delete that branch at some point. All its history is available in blead anyway.