Re: [PATCH] Re: [perl #76814] FETCH called twice.

On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 12:31:15PM -0700, Father Chrysostomos wrote:
> > Could you re-submit the patches,
> > a) with a binary backwards-compatibility entry for the old
> > now-replaced-with-macro functions in mathoms.c? See
> > 0d7d409d8d92b77ed7de5b74ab047eced86edfc3 for an example of this.
> 
> If we do not maintain binary compatibility in blead, then why are we
> maintaining binary compatibility in blead? Or are these actually for
> code using the Perl_ forms?

So that patches pulled into maint won't break binary compatibility.

-- 
Please note that ash-trays are provided for the use of smokers,
whereas the floor is provided for the use of all patrons.
    -- Bill Royston

• [PATCH] Re: [perl #76814] FETCH called twice. by Father Chrysostomos
• Re: [PATCH] Re: [perl #76814] FETCH called twice. by Abigail
• Re: [PATCH] Re: [perl #76814] FETCH called twice. by Father Chrysostomos
• Re: [PATCH] Re: [perl #76814] FETCH called twice. by Dave Mitchell
• Re: [PATCH] Re: [perl #76814] FETCH called twice. by Father Chrysostomos
• Re: [PATCH] Re: [perl #76814] FETCH called twice. by Dave Mitchell
• Re: [PATCH] Re: [perl #76814] FETCH called twice. by Nicholas Clark
• Mathoms (Re: [PATCH] Re: [p e r l #76814] FETCH called twice.) by Father Chrysostomos