Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from August 2010
From: Florian Ragwitz
August 29, 2010 16:10
Message ID: email@example.com
I don't think this should be in blead.
While actually having a patch is awesome, and might also help to reduce
some bike-shedding, I think pushing a module in a temporary namespace to
blead is pushing it a little to far. We don't want to ship 5.13.5 with
this temporary namespace, and I also think forcing this issue to be
resolved within the next <20 days is not a good thing.
I'd recommend to move this patch to a branch and revert it in blead.