On Aug 18, 2010, at 9:47 AM, Dave Mitchell wrote: > On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 12:22:13PM -0700, Father Chrysostomos wrote: >> If you are suggesting adding new fields to the xpvhv_aux struct, what do >> I need to know about alignment issues? >> >> (After doing some research, it now looks as though I just need one more >> field; viz., a HEK* to store an alternate name.) > > Note that hv_clear and hv_undef may remove the aux struct, so you may not > be able to rely on it always remaining. What happens to the name currently stored in there when that happens?Thread Previous | Thread Next