Ronald J Kimball wrote: > On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 09:13:06AM +0100, Zefram wrote: >> Ronald J Kimball wrote: >>> my @options_on = qw/ s a /; # where a and b are hypothetical options >>> my @options_off = qw/ i b /; # that are on by default >> No options are on by default. > > I know that's the current state, but is that a guarantee going forwards? > If options will always be off by default, then we probably don't need > (?.m-i:) at all; (?.m) would be sufficient. (And my objection to Ben's > proposal would be moot. :) > > I note that Karl mentioned that the new regex modifiers - /l, /u, and /d - > are "automatically inserted" under the appropriate conditions. I don't > know if that means they are "on by default" with regards to (?.) > > Ronald > Yes, /d is on by default.Thread Previous | Thread Next