Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating defaultregex modifiers? - nntp.perl.org

Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from August 2010

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating defaultregex modifiers?

Thread Previous | Thread Next

From:

Zefram

Date:

August 14, 2010 01:13

Subject:

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating defaultregex modifiers?

Message ID:

20100814081306.GB7654@lake.fysh.org

Ronald J Kimball wrote:
>my @options_on  = qw/ s a /;  # where a and b are hypothetical options
>my @options_off = qw/ i b /;  # that are on by default

No options are on by default.

-zefram

Thread Previous | Thread Next

Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating default regexmodifiers? by karl williamson

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating defaultregex modifiers? by Ben Morrow
Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating defaultregex modifiers? by Zefram

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating defaultregex modifiers? by karl williamson

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating defaultregex modifiers? by Zefram

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating default regex modifiers? by hv

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating default regex modifiers? by Nicholas Clark

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating defaultregex modifiers? by demerphq

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating default regex modifiers? by demerphq

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating defaultregex modifiers? by karl williamson

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating defaultregex modifiers? by Ben Morrow

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating defaultregex modifiers? by karl williamson

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating defaultregex modifiers? by Ben Morrow

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating defaultregex modifiers? by karl williamson

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating defaultregex modifiers? by Ben Morrow

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating default regex modifiers? by Ronald J Kimball

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating defaultregex modifiers? by Ben Morrow

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating default regex modifiers? by Ronald J Kimball

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating defaultregex modifiers? by Zefram

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating default regex modifiers? by Ronald J Kimball

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating defaultregex modifiers? by karl williamson

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating defaultregex modifiers? by Ben Morrow

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating defaultregex modifiers? by karl williamson

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating defaultregex modifiers? by Ben Morrow

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating defaultregex modifiers? by karl williamson

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating defaultregex modifiers? by Ben Morrow

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating default regex modifiers? by Eirik Berg Hanssen

Re: Any opposition still to the idea of syntax indicating defaultregex modifiers? by karl williamson

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About