Re: [perl #76138] perl inadvertently destroys signal handlers as of f746176000

On 1 August 2010 21:08, Father Chrysostomos <sprout@cpan.org> wrote:
> I could fix this either by making the %SIG initialisation less destructive (have it check whether each elem exists before assigning undef). Or I could stop all this magic from leaking into packages other than main (except for %OVERLOAD, etc.), breaking the JAPH above. Which is preferable?
>

I'd favor the second one, since unqualified %SIG is forced into main:: anyway.

• Re: [perl #76138] perl inadvertently destroys signal handlers as of f746176000 by Father Chrysostomos
• Re: [perl #76138] perl inadvertently destroys signal handlers as of f746176000 by Rafael Garcia-Suarez
• Re: [perl #76138] perl inadvertently destroys signal handlers asof f746176000 by Jesse Vincent
• Re: [perl #76138] perl inadvertently destroys signal handlers as of f746176000 by Father Chrysostomos
• Re: [perl #76138] perl inadvertently destroys signal handlers as of f746176000 by Father Chrysostomos
• Re: [perl #76138] perl inadvertently destroys signal handlers as of f746176000 by Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
• Re: [perl #76138] perl inadvertently destroys signal handlers as of f746176000 by Florian Ragwitz
• Re: [perl #76138] perl inadvertently destroys signal handlers as of f746176000 by Father Chrysostomos
• [perl #76138] perl inadvertently destroys signal handlers as of f746176000 by Florian Ragwitz via RT
• Re: [perl #76138] perl inadvertently destroys signal handlers asof f746176000 by Paul Johnson
• [perl #76138] perl inadvertently destroys signal handlers as of f746176000 by Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
• Re: [perl #76138] perl inadvertently destroys signal handlers asof f746176000 by Zefram