On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:36 AM, Jan Dubois <jand@activestate.com> wrote: > On Tue, 03 Aug 2010, Eric Brine wrote: > | Any of the following immediately following the delimiter are currently > | valid, but will become a syntax error (e.g. /foo/le+1) or different valid > | code (e.g. /foo/lt+1): > | > | - unless & until from /u > | - le & lt from /l > | - [none] from /t > > I don't understand what [none] means here, and how it becomes a syntax > error. > I think I meant /t was safe. /u, /l and /t were the proposed flags.Thread Previous | Thread Next