Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2010
Jesse Vincent schrieb: > I know that some cherrypicking for 5.12.2 has already happened, but it > would be incredibly useful to me if you (anyone reading this mail) would > spend a couple minutes looking at bugs and commits since 5.12.1 to see > what ought to get backported to 5.12.2 or really MUST be fixed before we > ship 5.12.2. > > If you're a committer and can spend time with cherrymaint, that'd be > great. If you're not a committer or would prefer not to do this with > cherrymaint, please reply to this message with rt.perl.org ticket > numbers or commit ids from blead. If the David's latest Module::Build fixes (for windows and cygwin) will not make it in, I will not prepare a cygwin 5.12 package at all and rather concentrate on 5.14. I skipped 5.12.0 and 5.12.1 on purpose. And this M::B is still not in blead. It fixes performance nightmare which I wanted to fix in PathTools, but also fixes it in M::B, and this is enough. 5.14 looks like a much nicer target anyway. Our p5p release cycle is too short to expect maintainers to update all their packages in time anyway. Getting timely perl-5.10 and python-2.6 updates was a few months work. -- Reini UrbanThread Previous | Thread Next