Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2010
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Zefram <zefram@fysh.org> wrote: > Precedence and associativity imply certain things about order of > evaluation, but the implications are minimal. In general, if a language > does not have other specific guarantees about order of evaluation, any > order is acceptable for the evaluation of the atomic terms and for the > operations represented by the operators. The order is constrained only > by the inherent need for the operands of any single operation to have > each been fully evaluated before that operation can take place. Sounds like something that should go into perlop. DavidThread Previous | Thread Next