Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2010
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 01:42:12PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> However, once the code is known working good, I feel that it's worth exploring
> something even more aggressive for GVs<=>CVs, as there are a lot of them, and
> it doesn't feel that nice using 24 (or 48) bytes for every CV in the symbol
> table, if we can avoid it.
sure!
--
"There's something wrong with our bloody ships today, Chatfield."
-- Admiral Beatty at the Battle of Jutland, 31st May 1916.
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next