On Fri 2.Jul'10 at 14:08:37 +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:03:57AM -0400, David Golden wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org> wrote: > > > And that when the cajoling stops, so does most of the activity. There's > > > little or no breadth here. A lot of people are relying on very few people > > > to actually do the work of reviewing and applying patches, fixing bugs, > > > and organising and making releases. > > > > That's why I'd like to see part of the responsibilities of the monthly > > release manager include the review of commits for cherry picking. > > (Admittedly, I'm not doing a very good job of that this month so far.) > > That's an extra bit of work, but given that perldelta construction > > seems to consist of commit-by-commit review anyway, it's only an extra > > step to an existing process. > > Yes, to my mind this is a good idea. Given that sometimes our release engineers are relative newbies to the core, I don't want to depend on that. But I do encourage it. . . o O { I wonder if we could give cherrymaint a leaderboard and weekly summary }Thread Previous | Thread Next