develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from May 2010

Re: PATCH: [perl #58182] partial, "The Unicode Bug". Add unicodesemantics for \s, \w

Thread Previous | Thread Next
karl williamson
May 25, 2010 18:36
Re: PATCH: [perl #58182] partial, "The Unicode Bug". Add unicodesemantics for \s, \w
Message ID:
James Mastros wrote:
> On 25 May 2010 15:37, Paul LeoNerd Evans <> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 07:15:12AM -0600, karl williamson wrote:
>>>>>    m/unicode    /Uugx;
>>>>>    m/locale     /Ulgx;
>>>>>    m/traditional/Utgx;
>>> Somehow, I'm a little leery of this, but I can't put my finger on
>>> it. I'll wait a little longer to see what others may say.
>>> One thing though if we do go this route, I think that U isn't as
>>> good a choice as maybe M for "matching mode", as Ul really isn't
>>> about Unicode: it is about locale.
> That suggests that we should possibly be calling it /L: /Lt
> (traditional), /Lu (unicode), /Ll (locale).  Sadly, /Ll isn't overly
> clear, given the two different definitions of the word "locale" in the
> same statement.  /Lp (posix) would be clearer, perhaps, but is overly
> technical.  Another possibility is calling it /I, for
> internationalization, but that reads to the sad /Il -- where one of
> those is an i-for-India , and the other an l-for-lima.
>    -=- James Mastros, theorbtwo
I don't get what L would stand for.  Please elaborate.

Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About