Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from May 2010
On 20 May 2010 00:56, Eric Brine <ikegami@adaelis.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 4:09 PM, demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 19 May 2010 18:11, Tom Christiansen <tchrist@perl.com> wrote: >> >>>> Only nit is i think covered by the -E option which implies a use >> >>>> LATEST; >> >>>> right? >> > >> >>> hum, neither perlrun nor feature mention the problem with backwards >> >>> compatibility of using -E. Maybe something like the following (but I'm >> >>> not >> >>> fully awake yet): >> > >> >>> Since L<feature> is used to introduce features that are not backwards >> >>> compatible, using C<< -E'...' >> instead of C<< -e'use 5.014; ...' >> >> >>> may >> >>> result in broken code when Perl is upgraded. >> > >> >> One wonders if we should mention that using one liners in production >> >> is not recommended? >> > >> > It's not?? >> >> Anyone who has written a book on Perl is excepted from this rule. > > I don't have any books to my cred, and I use one-liners in batch and bash > scripts. T'would appear you have two options, replace them with scripts or get published like Tom. ;-) Yves -- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"Thread Previous | Thread Next