Test::Simple/More/Builder 0.95_02 has just been released. I'm proud to say that I had very little to do with it. All the commits are the work of Nick Clayton and him not being afraid to flex his commit bit. :) http://github.com/schwern/test-more/tree/v0.95_02 0.95_01 introduced fixage [1] (my fault, not Nick's) when testing overloaded objects. is(), and probably other functions, no longer stringify their arguments before comparing. It was a long standing bug that they did. This means string overloaded objects will now use their eq method to compare rather than "". For a well written overloaded objects this should have no effect. Unfortunately, its very easy to forget to implement a comparison function or turn on fallback. DateTime objects prior to 0.54 did this. use Test::More; use DateTime; my $date1 = DateTime->new( year => 2010 ); my $date2 = DateTime->new( year => 2010 ); is( $date1, $date2 ); done_testing(); The above code will fail with DateTime prior to 0.54 and Test::More after (but not including) 0.94. Any code which uses DateTime objects should verify against the Test::More alpha and upgrade DateTime as necessary. Authors of string overloaded classes should also verify their implementations and unless you have a good reason not to, turn on fallback. For compatibility with older versions of DateTime and Test::More, you should quote DateTime objects before comparing with is(). is( "$date1", "$date2" ); CPAN Testers, please load your smokers with Test::More 0.95_02, compare the results with Test::More 0.94 and report any differences in test results to their respective authors. I would like to see a summary of the differences as well so I know the scope of the fixage. Thank you and sorry for the inconvenience. [1] Bug fixes which will reveal failing tests that accidentally pass. -- ROCKS FALL! EVERYONE DIES! http://www.somethingpositive.net/sp05032002.shtmlThread Next