Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from May 2010
Re: package block syntax
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
David Golden
Date:
May 19, 2010 09:49
Subject:
Re: package block syntax
Message ID:
AANLkTinDl3GAD8oFw211L9dAbMFvH5RWn8v5zKHztppe@mail.gmail.com
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Zefram <zefram@fysh.org> wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that's not the case with package block. The syntactic
> equivalence of "package Foo { ... }" with "{ package Foo; ... }" is a
> quite complete and precise description both of the effect that I'm aiming
> for and of how it's implemented. So I don't think there's room for
> surprises in this case. I totally accept the issue in the general case.
I haven't had tuits to look at the patch, but if you haven't done so
already, please make sure there are tests for:
package Foo 1.23 { ... }
and
package Foo v1.2.3 { ... }
Otherwise, I'm general supportive.
-- David
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next