>>> Only nit is i think covered by the -E option which implies a use LATEST; >>> right? >> hum, neither perlrun nor feature mention the problem with backwards >> compatibility of using -E. Maybe something like the following (but I'm not >> fully awake yet): >> Since L<feature> is used to introduce features that are not backwards >> compatible, using C<< -E'...' >> instead of C<< -e'use 5.014; ...' >> may >> result in broken code when Perl is upgraded. > One wonders if we should mention that using one liners in production > is not recommended? It's not?? --tomThread Previous | Thread Next