Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from May 2010
On 18 May 2010 21:30, Jesse Vincent <jesse@fsck.com> wrote: > Neither of those arguments suggest that this is a case when we should > break backward compatibility gratuitously. We shall have to agree to disagree that this is gratuitous breakage. I think thats going far too far. > We may well be unable to do this cleanly and sanely. But that's a very > different sort of argument. Basically we only have to worry about 'l' because of 'le', and 'f' because of 'if'. Any others? And actually it occurs to me that we can safely bypass the whole problem by using capitals :-) cheers, yves -- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"Thread Previous | Thread Next