Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from May 2010
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:28:32AM -0600, Alex Hunsaker wrote: > > Yeah, strange eh? I do think a straight multiplicity (no threads) > build is fairly uncommon [ in fact after i fixed this, mod_perl > refuses to compile, it expects threads to be enabled if you use > multiplicity :-( ]. Counter-example: Using a perl configured with multiplicity but without threads is recommended for PostgreSQL PL/Perl. It needs multiplicity to be able to use plperl and plperlu in the same session but doesn't want the overheads of thread support. Tim.Thread Previous | Thread Next