Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from May 2010
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org> wrote: > > I suspect that the reader/rejector assumed that the indexes for notnull() > > start at 0. They start at 1. If you make that mistake, you would conclude > > (wrongly) what the rejector did. > > Gah. I think I'm wrong here. I'm not convinced that the test case is > correct. > What you say matches the docs: extern void * my_memcpy (void *dest, const void *src, size_t len) __attribute__((nonnull (1, 2))); causes the compiler to check that, in calls to my_memcpy, arguments dest and src are non-null. so nonnull(2) would apply to o, the 2nd arg.Thread Previous | Thread Next